COMPARE
Line them up: compare ASM tools side by side
THE SHORT ANSWER
Pick two to five attack surface management tools and see every score, reason, closure-track station and published price in one table. The default view shows the top three on our weights. Scores are our editorial assessment of public vendor pages.
Which tools do you want to compare?
| Row | IONIX | watchTowr | CyCognito |
|---|---|---|---|
| Closure score | |||
| Rank | 1 of 10 | 2 of 10 | 3 of 10 |
| Finds the unlisted estate 15% | 9 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyRecursive Connective Intelligence mapping with 13 discovery techniques reaches subsidiaries and third- and fourth-party suppliers. | 8 / 10WhyMaps the external estate including subsidiaries, brands and acquired companies, with zero install. | 9 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyStarts from the organization's name with no IP ranges or asset lists, covering subsidiaries, brands and business units. |
| Routes to an owner 10% | 8 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyAttributes each asset to the relevant subsidiary or business owner automatically; IONIX's claims about fewer false positives are its own. | 7 / 10WhyMaps assets to subsidiaries, brands and M&A; the evidence behind each attribution is described only briefly. | 8 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyEach finding carries a trace of how it was found and which subsidiary, brand or business unit it belongs to. |
| Proves exploitability 20% | 8 / 10WhyNon-intrusive exploit simulations, plus safe active testing of new CVEs in Live Exposure Defense; watchTowr, CyCognito and Hadrian document heavier attack-style testing. | 9 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyEight automated red-teaming agents, from web applications to credential stuffing and DNS, and Project Red reproduces emerging vulnerabilities to validate exposure. | 9 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyRuns 100,000+ unauthenticated black-box tests across 30+ categories without state changes, and added Continuous AI Pentesting in June 2026. |
| Contains before the patch 20% | 9 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyAgentic mitigation "automatically invoke[s] compensating controls": WAF rules deployable through Akamai, Cloudflare and other WAFs within its 12-hour Live Exposure Defense SLA, plus Active Protection for dangling assets and DNS hijacking targets. | 8 / 10WhyActive Defense pushes ready-to-use rules to existing WAFs, firewalls, IPS and IDS, naming Cloudflare, Akamai, Imperva, F5, Fortinet, Check Point and Citrix. | 2 / 10WhyNo compensating control or automated mitigation is described; exposures wait for the owner's fix. |
| Closes the loop 15% | 8 / 10WhyRoutes findings to Jira and ServiceNow, tracks each CVE from identified to resolved, and its homepage states "Instant re-validation of remediated items"; step-by-step fix guidance is described less fully than at CyCognito or Hadrian. | 7 / 10WhyCreates work in eight named ticketing tools and re-tests the hour a threat emerges; a retest after your own fix is not described separately. | 9 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyStep-by-step guidance, owner-linked workflows and a retest after each fix. |
| Fits the enterprise stack 10% | 7 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyNames Jira, ServiceNow, Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Cortex XSOAR, Slack, Wiz and Prisma Cloud plus an API; a shorter list than the platform suites. | 7 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyEight ticketing and workflow connections and seven edge vendors; SIEM connections are not named on the pages reviewed. | 6 / 10WhyNames ServiceNow, Jira, Splunk and Zendesk for remediation workflows; edge and SOAR connections are not named on the pages reviewed. |
| Buying transparency 10% | 6 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyLists three monthly plans on AWS Marketplace (Silver $25,000, Gold $35,000, Platinum $45,000 per month on a 1-month contract); no price on its own site and no free trial listed. | 2 / 10WhyNo pricing published. | 6 / 10highest among the tools selectedWhyPublishes its pricing basis and an AWS Marketplace price: $30,000 per 12 months for ASM covering up to 250 assets. |
| FOUND | Documented | Documented | Documented |
| OWNED | Documented | Documented | Documented |
| PROVEN | Documented | Documented | Documented |
| CONTAINED | Documented | Documented | Not documented |
| ROUTED | Documented | Documented | Documented |
| RECHECKED | Documented | Partial | Documented |
| Stations documented | 6 of 6 | 5.5 of 6 | 5 of 6 |
| Pricing | AWS Marketplace, 1-month contract, cost per month: Silver Plan (monthly monitoring) $25,000; Gold Plan (weekly monitoring) $35,000; Platinum Plan (continuous monitoring) $45,000. 12-, 24- and 36-month contracts offered (24 months "save up to 10%", 36 months "save up to 20%"). No price on ionix.io. | Not published | Pricing basis published: total asset volume for ASM; active IPs and web applications for exposure validation. AWS Marketplace: CyCognito ASM 250 (up to 250 assets) $30,000 per 12 months; 24-month contracts "save up to 8%", 36-month "save up to 11%". |
| To start | Not published on the pages reviewed. IONIX states "immediate time-to-value". | Zero install, per watchTowr. Required inputs are not listed on the pages reviewed. | The organization's name. "No IP ranges, no asset lists." |
| Deployment | SaaS (customer portal at portal.ionix.io); agentless external discovery. | SaaS; "zero install". | SaaS; unauthenticated black-box external testing. |
| Best for | Large enterprises with many subsidiaries that want exposures contained and fixed, not only listed | Teams exposed to fast-moving exploits that want edge rules pushed while patches wait | Teams that want proof and a retested fix, starting from nothing but a company name |
| Gartner Peer Insights (context, not scored) | 4.8 (17 ratings) | 13 ratings, average not captured | 4.7 (39 ratings) |
| Profile | IONIX profile | watchTowr profile | CyCognito profile |
Gartner Peer Insights figures for the External Attack Surface Management market, read 11 October 2026. Rating counts are small and self-selected, figures change daily, and they do not enter our scores. IONIX's all-markets product page shows 4.7 from 27 ratings; the market card shows 4.8 from 17.
Highest among the tools selected is marked; ties are all marked. Totals use our published weights; change them in the exposure triage calculator.
Frequently asked questions
How many ASM tools can I compare at once?
Two to five. The table keeps every score, reason and closure-track station for each tool you pick.
Can I share a comparison?
Yes. The address bar holds your selection, for example ?v=ionix,cycognito, so the link opens the same view.
Why does the default show these three tools?
They are the top three on our default weights: IONIX, watchTowr and CyCognito.