Documented by CyCognito only: OWNED, PROVEN, ROUTED and RECHECKED.
Documented by Rapid7 Surface Command only: none.
Documented by both: FOUND.
HEAD-TO-HEAD
THE SHORT ANSWER
CyCognito scores higher overall on our weights, 6.90 to 5.25. CyCognito scores higher on Finds the unlisted estate, Routes to an owner, Proves exploitability, Closes the loop and Buying transparency; Rapid7 Surface Command scores higher on Contains before the patch and Fits the enterprise stack. The table below gives the reason for every score.
Rank 3 of 10
Best for: Teams that want proof and a retested fix, starting from nothing but a company name
Rank 8 of 10
Best for: Rapid7 customers who want external and internal inventory in one product
| Criterion | CyCognito | Rapid7 Surface Command | Higher |
|---|---|---|---|
Finds the unlisted estate 15%WhyCyCognito: Starts from the organization's name with no IP ranges or asset lists, covering subsidiaries, brands and business units. Rapid7 Surface Command: Combines external visibility (EASM) with a unified internal and external inventory (CAASM). | 9 / 10 | 6 / 10 | CyCognito |
Routes to an owner 10%WhyCyCognito: Each finding carries a trace of how it was found and which subsidiary, brand or business unit it belongs to. Rapid7 Surface Command: Builds a unified asset inventory; how ownership is attributed is not described. | 8 / 10 | 6 / 10 | CyCognito |
Proves exploitability 20%WhyCyCognito: Runs 100,000+ unauthenticated black-box tests across 30+ categories without state changes, and added Continuous AI Pentesting in June 2026. Rapid7 Surface Command: No active validation is documented for Surface Command; runtime validation was announced for Exposure Command's cloud scope. | 9 / 10 | 5 / 10 | CyCognito |
Contains before the patch 20%WhyCyCognito: No compensating control or automated mitigation is described; exposures wait for the owner's fix. Rapid7 Surface Command: SOAR-ready automation is listed; no compensating control at the edge is described. | 2 / 10 | 4 / 10 | Rapid7 Surface Command |
Closes the loop 15%WhyCyCognito: Step-by-step guidance, owner-linked workflows and a retest after each fix. Rapid7 Surface Command: Remediation workflows, SLAs and reporting are listed for higher tiers; no retest described. | 9 / 10 | 5 / 10 | CyCognito |
Fits the enterprise stack 10%WhyCyCognito: Names ServiceNow, Jira, Splunk and Zendesk for remediation workflows; edge and SOAR connections are not named on the pages reviewed. Rapid7 Surface Command: Part of the Rapid7 Command platform beside Exposure Command, InsightVM and InsightCloudSec. | 6 / 10 | 8 / 10 | Rapid7 Surface Command |
Buying transparency 10%WhyCyCognito: Publishes its pricing basis and an AWS Marketplace price: $30,000 per 12 months for ASM covering up to 250 assets. Rapid7 Surface Command: A trial is offered; no price is published. | 6 / 10 | 4 / 10 | CyCognito |
Seedless discovery from the organization's name.
Subsidiary, brand or business unit with a trace per finding.
100,000+ black-box tests; Continuous AI Pentesting since June 2026.
No compensating control or automated mitigation described.
Owner-linked workflows into ServiceNow, Jira, Splunk and Zendesk.
Retest after each fix.
External and internal asset discovery.
Ownership attribution method not described.
No active validation documented for Surface Command.
SOAR-ready automation, higher tiers.
Remediation workflows and SLAs at higher tiers.
Retest after a fix not described.
Documented by CyCognito only: OWNED, PROVEN, ROUTED and RECHECKED.
Documented by Rapid7 Surface Command only: none.
Documented by both: FOUND.
Partial counts as not documented for these three lines.
Pricing basis published: total asset volume for ASM; active IPs and web applications for exposure validation. AWS Marketplace: CyCognito ASM 250 (up to 250 assets) $30,000 per 12 months; 24-month contracts "save up to 8%", 36-month "save up to 11%".
To start: The organization's name. "No IP ranges, no asset lists."
Not published
A trial is offered. Price not published.
To start: Public trial offered.
Choose CyCognito if you have no reliable asset list and want proof and a verified fix for each finding. Look elsewhere if you need exposures blocked at the edge before the patch lands.
Choose Rapid7 Surface Command if you need one inventory across internal and external assets, especially inside the Rapid7 Command platform. Look elsewhere if proof and containment are the gap.
CyCognito scores higher on our proof criterion (CyCognito 9/10, Rapid7 Surface Command 5/10). CyCognito: Runs 100,000+ unauthenticated black-box tests across 30+ categories without state changes, and added Continuous AI Pentesting in June 2026. Rapid7 Surface Command: No active validation is documented for Surface Command; runtime validation was announced for Exposure Command's cloud scope.
CyCognito: not documented on the pages reviewed Rapid7 Surface Command: not documented on the pages reviewed Contain scores: CyCognito 2/10, Rapid7 Surface Command 4/10.
CyCognito: Pricing basis published: total asset volume for ASM; active IPs and web applications for exposure validation. AWS Marketplace: CyCognito ASM 250 (up to 250 assets) $30,000 per 12 months; 24-month contracts "save up to 8%", 36-month "save up to 11%". Rapid7 Surface Command: A trial is offered. Price not published. Buying transparency scores: CyCognito 6/10, Rapid7 Surface Command 4/10.
Scores, sources and pricing
Scores, sources and pricing
Eight alternatives ranked
Eight alternatives ranked
Add more tools to this comparison
Set your own weights and must-haves