Skip to content

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Cortex Xpanse vs CyCognito: which ASM tool takes an exposure further?

THE SHORT ANSWER

CyCognito scores higher overall on our weights, 6.90 to 6.40. Cortex Xpanse scores higher on Contains before the patch and Fits the enterprise stack; CyCognito scores higher on Finds the unlisted estate, Routes to an owner, Proves exploitability, Closes the loop and Buying transparency. The table below gives the reason for every score.

By The Perimeter Desk · EASM Compared · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages and documentation; vendor facts read September 2026, updated 13 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.

Cortex Xpanse

Rank 5 of 10

Cortex Xpanse closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: partial; PROVEN: not documented; CONTAINED: documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: not documented

Best for: Palo Alto Networks Cortex estates that want automated response through XSOAR

Read the Cortex Xpanse profile

CyCognito

Rank 3 of 10

CyCognito closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: documented; PROVEN: documented; CONTAINED: not documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: documented

Best for: Teams that want proof and a retested fix, starting from nothing but a company name

Read the CyCognito profile

Which tool scores higher on each criterion?

Criterion scores 0 to 10 with weights. Open Why for both reasons and sources.
CriterionCortex XpanseCyCognitoHigher
Finds the unlisted estate 15%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: Palo Alto Networks states it scans all 4.3 billion IPv4 addresses several times a day and 500 billion+ ports daily.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito: Starts from the organization's name with no IP ranges or asset lists, covering subsidiaries, brands and business units.

Source: CyCognito discovery · Read 27 Sep 2026

8 / 109 / 10CyCognito
Routes to an owner 10%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: Identifies third-party stakeholders for exposures; subsidiary attribution detail is not on the pages reviewed.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse attack surface management · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito: Each finding carries a trace of how it was found and which subsidiary, brand or business unit it belongs to.

Source: CyCognito discovery · Read 27 Sep 2026

7 / 108 / 10CyCognito
Proves exploitability 20%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: Exploitability validation is not described on the product pages reviewed; the emphasis is discovery and response.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito: Runs 100,000+ unauthenticated black-box tests across 30+ categories without state changes, and added Continuous AI Pentesting in June 2026.

Source: CyCognito active security testing · Read 27 Sep 2026

5 / 109 / 10CyCognito
Contains before the patch 20%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: Active Response runs built-in automated playbooks against exposures; edge WAF rules are not named.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito: No compensating control or automated mitigation is described; exposures wait for the owner's fix.

Source: CyCognito remediation acceleration · Read 27 Sep 2026

7 / 102 / 10Cortex Xpanse
Closes the loop 15%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: Routes and remediates through Cortex XSOAR playbooks; a retest after the fix is not described.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse attack surface management · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito: Step-by-step guidance, owner-linked workflows and a retest after each fix.

Source: CyCognito remediation acceleration · Read 27 Sep 2026

6 / 109 / 10CyCognito
Fits the enterprise stack 10%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: Native ties to Cortex XSOAR and Prisma Cloud inside the Palo Alto Networks Cortex portfolio.

Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse attack surface management · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito: Names ServiceNow, Jira, Splunk and Zendesk for remediation workflows; edge and SOAR connections are not named on the pages reviewed.

Source: CyCognito remediation acceleration · Read 27 Sep 2026

9 / 106 / 10Cortex Xpanse
Buying transparency 10%
Why

Cortex Xpanse: No price from Palo Alto Networks; a UK G-Cloud reseller listing shows £70,850.84 per instance per year.

Source: UK G-Cloud 14 listing for Cortex Xpanse by reseller Khipu Networks · Read 11 Oct 2026

CyCognito: Publishes its pricing basis and an AWS Marketplace price: $30,000 per 12 months for ASM covering up to 250 assets.

Source: AWS Marketplace: CyCognito Attack Surface Management Platform · Read 11 Oct 2026

3 / 106 / 10CyCognito

Which steps does each tool document?

Cortex Xpanse

Cortex Xpanse closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: partial; PROVEN: not documented; CONTAINED: documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: not documented
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: only in general terms, a higher tier or another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
A filled station means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works.
  1. FOUNDDocumented

    Internet-wide IPv4 scanning several times a day.

    Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse · Read 27 Sep 2026

  2. OWNEDPartial

    Third-party stakeholders identified; subsidiary attribution not detailed.

    Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse attack surface management · Read 27 Sep 2026

  3. PROVENNot documented

    Exploitability validation not described on the pages reviewed.

    Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse · Read 27 Sep 2026

  4. CONTAINEDDocumented

    Active Response automated playbooks.

    Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse · Read 27 Sep 2026

  5. ROUTEDDocumented

    Routing and remediation through Cortex XSOAR playbooks.

    Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse attack surface management · Read 27 Sep 2026

  6. RECHECKEDNot documented

    Retest after a fix not described.

    Source: Palo Alto Networks: Cortex Xpanse attack surface management · Read 27 Sep 2026

CyCognito

CyCognito closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: documented; PROVEN: documented; CONTAINED: not documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: documented
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: only in general terms, a higher tier or another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
A filled station means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works.
  1. FOUNDDocumented

    Seedless discovery from the organization's name.

    Source: CyCognito discovery · Read 27 Sep 2026

  2. OWNEDDocumented

    Subsidiary, brand or business unit with a trace per finding.

    Source: CyCognito discovery · Read 27 Sep 2026

  3. PROVENDocumented

    100,000+ black-box tests; Continuous AI Pentesting since June 2026.

    Source: CyCognito active security testing · Read 27 Sep 2026

  4. CONTAINEDNot documented

    No compensating control or automated mitigation described.

    Source: CyCognito remediation acceleration · Read 27 Sep 2026

  5. ROUTEDDocumented

    Owner-linked workflows into ServiceNow, Jira, Splunk and Zendesk.

    Source: CyCognito remediation acceleration · Read 27 Sep 2026

  6. RECHECKEDDocumented

    Retest after each fix.

    Source: CyCognito remediation acceleration · Read 27 Sep 2026

Documented by Cortex Xpanse only: CONTAINED.

Documented by CyCognito only: OWNED, PROVEN and RECHECKED.

Documented by both: FOUND and ROUTED.

Partial counts as not documented for these three lines.

What do they cost?

Cortex Xpanse

No price from Palo Alto Networks. Reseller price: a UK G-Cloud 14 listing by Khipu Networks shows £70,850.84 per instance per year, no free trial, public-facing attack surface only.

Source: UK G-Cloud 14 listing for Cortex Xpanse by reseller Khipu Networks · Read 11 Oct 2026

To start: Not published on the pages reviewed.

CyCognito

Pricing basis published: total asset volume for ASM; active IPs and web applications for exposure validation. AWS Marketplace: CyCognito ASM 250 (up to 250 assets) $30,000 per 12 months; 24-month contracts "save up to 8%", 36-month "save up to 11%".

Source: AWS Marketplace: CyCognito Attack Surface Management Platform · Read 11 Oct 2026

To start: The organization's name. "No IP ranges, no asset lists."

Which should you choose?

Choose Cortex Xpanse if

  • it matters most to you that it fits the enterprise stack (9/10)
  • it matters most to you that it finds the unlisted estate (8/10)

Choose Cortex Xpanse if Cortex XSOAR already runs your response and you want exposures acted on by playbook. Look elsewhere if proof of exploitability is your main gap.

Choose CyCognito if

  • it matters most to you that it proves exploitability (9/10)
  • it matters most to you that it finds the unlisted estate (9/10)

Choose CyCognito if you have no reliable asset list and want proof and a verified fix for each finding. Look elsewhere if you need exposures blocked at the edge before the patch lands.

Frequently asked questions

Which proves exploitability better, Cortex Xpanse or CyCognito?

CyCognito scores higher on our proof criterion (Cortex Xpanse 5/10, CyCognito 9/10). Cortex Xpanse: Exploitability validation is not described on the product pages reviewed; the emphasis is discovery and response. CyCognito: Runs 100,000+ unauthenticated black-box tests across 30+ categories without state changes, and added Continuous AI Pentesting in June 2026.

Can Cortex Xpanse or CyCognito contain an exposure before the patch?

Cortex Xpanse documents one: Active Response automated playbooks. CyCognito: not documented on the pages reviewed Contain scores: Cortex Xpanse 7/10, CyCognito 2/10.

Which is easier to buy, Cortex Xpanse or CyCognito?

Cortex Xpanse: No price from Palo Alto Networks. Reseller price: a UK G-Cloud 14 listing by Khipu Networks shows £70,850.84 per instance per year, no free trial, public-facing attack surface only. CyCognito: Pricing basis published: total asset volume for ASM; active IPs and web applications for exposure validation. AWS Marketplace: CyCognito ASM 250 (up to 250 assets) $30,000 per 12 months; 24-month contracts "save up to 8%", 36-month "save up to 11%". Buying transparency scores: Cortex Xpanse 3/10, CyCognito 6/10.