Skip to content

HEAD-TO-HEAD

Censys ASM vs Hadrian: which ASM tool takes an exposure further?

THE SHORT ANSWER

Hadrian scores higher overall on our weights, 6.60 to 5.15. Censys ASM scores higher on Fits the enterprise stack; Hadrian scores higher on Routes to an owner, Proves exploitability, Closes the loop and Buying transparency; they tie on Finds the unlisted estate and Contains before the patch. The table below gives the reason for every score.

By The Perimeter Desk · EASM Compared · Published 2026-10-11

Desk research from public vendor pages and documentation; vendor facts read September 2026, updated 13 October 2026. Editorial assessment; we did not test the products.

Censys ASM

Rank 9 of 10

Censys ASM closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: not documented; PROVEN: partial; CONTAINED: not documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: not documented

Best for: Threat intelligence and hunting teams that want raw internet scan evidence

Read the Censys ASM profile

Hadrian

Rank 4 of 10

Hadrian closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: partial; PROVEN: documented; CONTAINED: not documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: documented

Best for: Teams replacing periodic external pentests with continuous, agent-based proof

Read the Hadrian profile

Which tool scores higher on each criterion?

Criterion scores 0 to 10 with weights. Open Why for both reasons and sources.
CriterionCensys ASMHadrianHigher
Finds the unlisted estate 15%
Why

Censys ASM: First-party scanning across all 65K ports, expanding from seeds the customer adds.

Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: Scans hourly or on events to keep the external inventory current; subsidiary mapping is not documented.

Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

7 / 107 / 10Tie
Routes to an owner 10%
Why

Censys ASM: Assets found beyond your seeds appear under a "Found by Censys" tab; attribution logic is not described in detail.

Source: Censys docs: seed your attack surface · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: Machine learning confirms whether an asset belongs to the organization.

Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

6 / 107 / 10Hadrian
Proves exploitability 20%
Why

Censys ASM: Confirms reachability and applies EPSS and KEV context; active exploitation testing is not documented.

Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: Agentic AI exploits issues to prove impact; Hadrian states it proves exploitability within 15 minutes.

Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

5 / 109 / 10Hadrian
Contains before the patch 20%
Why

Censys ASM: No compensating control is described.

Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: No edge rule, playbook or other compensating control is described.

Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

2 / 102 / 10Tie
Closes the loop 15%
Why

Censys ASM: Auto-creates, routes and tracks remediation tasks; no retest after a fix is described.

Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: Remediation guidance, automatic tickets and automatic regression testing after a fix.

Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

6 / 109 / 10Hadrian
Fits the enterprise stack 10%
Why

Censys ASM: Names Jira, ServiceNow ITSM and CMDB, Tenable VM, Google Security Operations, Microsoft Sentinel, Axonius, Brinqa, Slack, Webex and the three major clouds.

Source: Censys integrations · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: Names Jira, ServiceNow, GLPI, Slack, Microsoft Teams, SentinelOne, Datadog, Zendesk and HubSpot plus an API.

Source: Hadrian integrations · Read 27 Sep 2026

8 / 106 / 10Censys ASM
Buying transparency 10%
Why

Censys ASM: A free platform account and credits from $100 exist; ASM itself is contact sales.

Source: Censys pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian: NOVA pentests from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT, and ATLAS on AWS Marketplace at $50,000 per 12 months for up to 250 assets.

Source: Hadrian pricing (re-read) · Read 13 Oct 2026 · AWS Marketplace: Hadrian Atlas External Attack Surface Management · Read 11 Oct 2026

4 / 107 / 10Hadrian

Which steps does each tool document?

Censys ASM

Censys ASM closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: not documented; PROVEN: partial; CONTAINED: not documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: not documented
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: only in general terms, a higher tier or another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
A filled station means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works.
  1. FOUNDDocumented

    65K-port first-party scanning, expanding from seeds.

    Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

  2. OWNEDNot documented

    Attribution logic not described in detail.

    Source: Censys docs: seed your attack surface · Read 27 Sep 2026

  3. PROVENPartial

    Reachability confirmation with EPSS and KEV; no exploitation.

    Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

  4. CONTAINEDNot documented

    No compensating control described.

    Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

  5. ROUTEDDocumented

    Auto-creates and routes remediation tasks.

    Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

  6. RECHECKEDNot documented

    Retest after a fix not described.

    Source: Censys external exposure management · Read 27 Sep 2026

Hadrian

Hadrian closure trackFOUND: documented; OWNED: partial; PROVEN: documented; CONTAINED: not documented; ROUTED: documented; RECHECKED: documented
  • Documented on the vendor's pages
  • Partial: only in general terms, a higher tier or another product
  • Not documented on the pages reviewed
A filled station means the vendor's own pages describe that step. It does not measure how well or how often the step works.
  1. FOUNDDocumented

    Hourly or event-triggered external scanning.

    Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

  2. OWNEDPartial

    Ownership confirmed by machine learning; subsidiary mapping not described.

    Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

  3. PROVENDocumented

    Agentic exploitation; proof within 15 minutes, per Hadrian.

    Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

  4. CONTAINEDNot documented

    No edge rule or compensating control described.

    Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

  5. ROUTEDDocumented

    Automatic ticket creation.

    Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

  6. RECHECKEDDocumented

    Automatic regression testing after fixes.

    Source: Hadrian technology · Read 27 Sep 2026

Documented by Censys ASM only: none.

Documented by Hadrian only: PROVEN and RECHECKED.

Documented by both: FOUND and ROUTED.

Partial counts as not documented for these three lines.

What do they cost?

Censys ASM

Not published

ASM: contact sales. A free Censys platform account exists, and platform credits start from $100.

Source: Censys pricing · Read 27 Sep 2026

To start: Seeds you add in the console or through the API.

Hadrian

NOVA agentic penetration test: from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT. ATLAS on AWS Marketplace: 250 assets (domains, IP addresses and certificates) $50,000 per 12 months.

Source: Hadrian pricing (re-read) · Read 13 Oct 2026

To start: Not specified on the pages reviewed.

Which should you choose?

Choose Censys ASM if

  • it matters most to you that it fits the enterprise stack (8/10)
  • it matters most to you that it finds the unlisted estate (7/10)

Choose Censys ASM if your threat intelligence or hunting team wants raw scan evidence and broad integrations. Look elsewhere if you need exploitation proof or containment.

Choose Hadrian if

  • it matters most to you that it proves exploitability (9/10)
  • it matters most to you that it closes the loop (9/10)

Choose Hadrian if you want continuous, attack-based proof in place of periodic external pentests, with a price you can see. Look elsewhere if you need edge mitigation or attribution across many subsidiaries.

Frequently asked questions

Which proves exploitability better, Censys ASM or Hadrian?

Hadrian scores higher on our proof criterion (Censys ASM 5/10, Hadrian 9/10). Censys ASM: Confirms reachability and applies EPSS and KEV context; active exploitation testing is not documented. Hadrian: Agentic AI exploits issues to prove impact; Hadrian states it proves exploitability within 15 minutes.

Can Censys ASM or Hadrian contain an exposure before the patch?

Censys ASM: not documented on the pages reviewed Hadrian: not documented on the pages reviewed Contain scores: Censys ASM 2/10, Hadrian 2/10.

Which is easier to buy, Censys ASM or Hadrian?

Censys ASM: contact sales. A free Censys platform account exists, and platform credits start from $100. Hadrian: NOVA agentic penetration test: from 1,250 euros per test excluding VAT. ATLAS on AWS Marketplace: 250 assets (domains, IP addresses and certificates) $50,000 per 12 months. Buying transparency scores: Censys ASM 4/10, Hadrian 7/10.